理想化认知模型方法下的文学语篇连贯 [2]
论文作者:英语论文论文属性:硕士毕业论文 thesis登出时间:2016-10-08编辑:lgg点击率:5793
论文字数:38662论文编号:org201610062149299909语种:英语 English地区:中国价格:$ 66
关键词:英语语言学论文语篇连贯理想化认知模型背景知识
摘要:本文是英语语言学论文,本文的研究在于分析并解决如下问题:(1)结合背景信息,理想化认知模型能否解释英汉各类体裁的语篇连贯问题 (2) 背景知识如何对语篇连贯产生作用;(3)各类体裁对背景知识所需要的程度问题。
e-rheme development, and given-new organization; And non-structural cohesion as grammatical cohesive devices and lexical cohesive devices. Their researches on cohesive devices lay a strong foundation for the development of discourse coherent analysis.When speaking to the relationship between cohesion and coherence, Halliday and Hasan spare no efforts to prove their essential relationship in their early researches. Though later they pay a little attention to register. However, it is unavoidable to say that they place cohesion devices into a crucial position as to their contribution to coherence. It can be inferred from their work(9) which says cohesive ties between sentences stand out more clearly because they are the only source of texture; and their work(94) which says that cohesion is the foundation upon which the edifice of coherence is built. They seem to treat cohesive devices as a necessary condition for coherence, or at least put cohesive devices into an outstanding position. So here comes the question: is cohesive device necessary condition for coherence? After their researches on cohesive devices, many scholars have put forward their critical ideas as follows:
...........
Chapter Two Idealized Cognitive Model and Background Knowledge
2.1 Embodied
Philosophy
In the course of philosophical development, there exists a long standing discrepancy between empiricism and rationalism, which results in opposite linguistic perspectives, and thus different linguistic schools. Even at the beginning of cognitive linguistics, these two traditional philosophies still exert great influence on it. Though modern cognitive linguistics focuses on human cognition and mind based on bodily experience, it has not been free from their influence. Abroad, cognitive linguists tend to adopt either of these two philosophies, while at home, cognitive linguists not only bring in western cognitive linguistic theory, but also try to find a new way, that is, combine these two opposite philosophies. In face of such a complicate situation, in 1999, Lakoff, together with Johnson compiles a work named Philosophy in the Flesh—The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought, in which they propose a brand new philosophical theory, namely philosophy in the flesh or embodied philosophy. According to Lakoff and Johnson, it is this philosophy that cognitive linguistics is based on. As a matter of fact, Lakoff has introduced this philosophy in his work Women,Fire,and Dangerous Things: W
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。