英语论文网

s us try to understand. In this case the gap between the Obama’s original meaning and the potential interpretation (- an indirect suggestion that China was an enemy of America) of the average low-educated person in China who occupy the majority of the population could create a threat to ‘the regime’. Generally speaking it is the responsibility of the translator to ensure that the translator can place the text within a context that allows them to comprehend. This is often done by providing “additional elements” (B Czarniawska 2004). At the same time, this can reversed if the information is put into a negative context it can be omitted. The decision to omit was made on the grounds that there was never any intent in the speech other then to strengthen the fact that American’s are proud of their past and what they believe in. However, if we analyse it in terms of Reiss’s text type text it falls within the informative category. It would be suggested that any translation should be content-focused. This disappointingly is not the case.

 

Another example of how translation strategies have been influenced by political elements is the translation of Kurlantzick’s “Tibet Now”, a travel review of Tibet. Due to so called political incorrect references to the Dalai Lama, the cultural revolution and certain websites inaccessible to residents in mainland China the translator was forced to render the text to guarantee it was Chinese reader friendly. Modulation was used to deal with elements unsuitable in the target language. Adaptation techniques were also applied as certain information would be unknown to the target reader. Furthermore, the Chinese government would not want these unknown items left in with supplementary explanations. The translation was published in the Can Kao Xiao Xi  a well recognised Chinese language digest of the global news front. The translator almost completely rewrote the text as part of a domestication process like Venuti labelled as “ethnocentric reduction of the foreign text to target-language cultural values”. It is favoured by many translators as it goes against the language and values of the dominant culture (English). This balances the culture exchange. In this case the translator is left with no other choice. This simply due to the strict regulations on many translations published within China. This text would inevitably fall into Reiss’s ‘special case’ category as it crosses over the borders more than one category, it has clearly been translated upon someone-else’s order which has allowed for the function to change. This method of translation is incompatible with Chinese translation theories like Yan Fu’s xin, da, ya as well as others. But if the omission of the information is taken as ensuring beauty within the target language then one may draw similarities to the Laozi statement that beautiful words or not honest and honest words are not beautiful.

 

Another example is a Reuters new report regarding the earthquake in which a Tibetan monk was ignored. The Chinese translation failed display large amounts of the information; the death-toll, the fact that it was mainly ethnic minorities that lost their lives, the fact that there was people paying respect on Tiananmen square 本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。