英语论文网

and 0.98%inEPC,a gap of 0.18%.In terms of nominalization on the clausal level,the use ofnominalization in English enterprise profiles written by native speakers takes a higherproportion than those by the Chinese translators in general.Clausal nominalizationemployed by native speakers and the Chinese translators accounts for 1.58%and0.58%respectively,with a difference of 1%.As for the three sub-types of clausalnominalization,native speakers are inclined to use more Infinitive to,that-clause andwh-clause than the Chinese translators.The percentage of Infinitive to in ETC andEPC is 0.37%and 0.61%respectively,a difference of 0.24%.The that-clause takes aproportion of 0.14%in ETC and 0.66%in EPC,a gap of 0.52%.The frequency ofwh-clause accounts for 0.07%in ETC and 0.31%in EPC,marking a 0.24%gap.Therefore,it is clear that the Chinese translators do not prefer to use clausalnominalization.

Chapter Six Conclusion

6.1 Major Findings and Summary

Nominalization is an effective way to condense information,which meets therequirement of conciseness of enterprise profiles and can realize the pragmaticfunction of the text.Taking the native corpus as a reference,the present study aims toknow whether there is a statistical difference in the use of nominalization in ETC andEPC by conducting a corpus-based comparative research.Quantitative analysis aimsto find out the distribution of nominalization in the two corpora,while qualitativeanalysis aims to explore the reasons for the differences in the use of nominalizationand put forward some translation strategies for dealing with nominalization inenterprise profiles.Based on the data analyzed,the following findings can besummarized.

In terms of the first research question,the research data shows that there is significant difference in the use of nominalization both on lexical level and clausallevel between the comparison of ETC and EPC.The frequency of lexicalnominalization is higher than that of clausal nominalization.On the lexical level,thedetailed analysis of the use of nominalization shows that suffixation in ETC is morethan that in EPC and significant difference is found in the use of suffixation.To bespecific,suffixation from verbs takes a higher proportion than suffixation fromadjectives and significant differences exist in the use of verb derivative suffixes-tion/-sion-ment-ence/-ance and adjective derivative suffixes-ity/-ty-ence/-ance.Conversion accounts for a larger proportion in ETC compared with EPC and-inggerund appears less frequently in ETC.However,no significant difference is found inthe use of conversion and-ing gerund.In general,verb nominalization is higher thanadjective nominalization.As for the five types of nominalization,statisticalsignificance is found in the use of quality nominalization and process nominalization,but there is no significant difference in circumstance nominalization,relatornominalization,and zero nominalization.On the clausal level,significant differenceexists in the use of that-clause,wh-clause and to-infinitive.

reference(omitted)

本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。