Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal
英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献
ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter
澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文
小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法
英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查
temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语
经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目
日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题
职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意
论文作者:留学生论文论文属性:硕士毕业论文 thesis登出时间:2024-05-10编辑:vicky点击率:92
论文字数:36966论文编号:org202405081715192933语种:英语 English地区:中国价格:$ 66
摘要:本文是一篇英语语法论文,本研究从中国英语学习者语料库(ICNALE)和英语本族语者语料库(ICNALE、LOCNESS)中提取含有目标情态动词的样例,共计4982条,并对其进行手工标注;开展多因素预测与偏差回归分析(MuPDAR),探讨影响中国英语学习者在使用情态动词can、may和could时偏离本族语者的主要因素,并对比三个情态动词在各显著因素下的差异程度。
本文是一篇英语语法论文,本研究结果表明,在主语形态和平均词长因素上,中国英语学习者在使用情态动词can、may和could时显著偏离英语本族语者;在句式肯定/否定、情态意义、动词语义和主语生命性因素上,中国英语学习者使用情态动词can和may显著偏离英语本族语者;
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Research Background
As form and meaning/function pairings, modal verbs have always been a central concern of research in second language acquisition (SLA), and they pose great challenges to second/foreign language learners (Deshors & Gries, 2014). The acquisition of modal verbs is a crucial aspect of the development of conceptual competence in second language (SL) (Jiang & Zhou, 2015). While it has been claimed that can, may and could share a high degree of similarity since they are members of core modal verbs (Biber et al., 1999) and can also express overlapping semantics of possibility, permission, and ability (Coates, 1983; Collins, 2007), significant differences still exist in actual use. For example, in most cases, can and could are used to convey dynamic modality indicating ability, whereas may encodes epistemic modality. However, when acquiring synonymous modal verbs like can and could, Chinese learners tend to perceive little discernible semantic difference between them, and only focus on their form. It is crucial to note that recurrent chunks surrounding modals can be seen as linguistic units on their own. Therefore, research on modal verbs should not be limited to the form of the modal verb itself but may also include surrounding lexical elements and/or syntactic categories (Depraetere et al., 2023). As such, there is a need for a more detailed study of the use of the synonymous modal verbs by Chinese EFL learners to distinguish the subtle differences between their usage patterns in context by comparison to that of native speakers.
Although the current research on modal verbs is extensive, the majority of studies have mainly relied on simplistic frequency comparison, with a primary emphasis on identifying overuse, underuse and/or misuse by second language learners. However, motivators do not decide a language choice alone (Kang & Xu, 2021). The integration of linguistic contextual features plays a crucial role in the analysis of linguistic items (Klinge & Müller, 2005). Despite the call for more multifactorial investigations that consider contextual co-selection patterns by scholars like Xu (2020), the research in China that implements a multifactorial approach towards this issue is still rather scanty.
1.2 Purpose and Significance
The purpose of this study is to investigate the differences in the choice of modal verbs can, may and could, and to explore syntactical, morphological, semantic and stylistic factors constraining the use of these modal verbs by Chinese EFL learners. Moreover, this study aims to determine the motivators that contribute to the deviation of Chinese learners from native speakers in using these modal verbs, following Schmid’s (2015, 2020) usage-based Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model (EC-Model). The research has methodological, theoretical and practical significance.
Methodologically, this study expands the MuPDAR approach by performing a multinomial logistic regression and multiple pairwise linear regression modelling. Potential influencing factors can be investigated using multifactorial approaches. While it has been gaining currency in the real本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。