英语论文网

;of the 20 pairs; at last, revealing the deep motives hidden between the words by studying the construction of the texts.  The issue of the sovereignty of Diaoyu Island (known as Senkaku in Japan) and its  affiliated  islets  has  long  been  the  focus  of  China  and  Japan  about  the  territory disputes since 1970s. In recent years, it has evolved into a significant political conflict. In 2012, the dispute reached its peak when the Japanese government bought three of the five islands from their private owner, which escalated the tension between the two countries to a new extent. 
.........

Conclusion 

This thesis conducts a constrastive analysis of the Chinese and American news editorials from the perspective of the DCI model. The primary purpose of this thesis is  to  figure  out  the  hidden  rhetorical  motives  as  well  as  attitudes  and  investigate  the differences  between  American  and  Chinese  media  as  regard  to  the  approaches  of realization of the motives. The following section concludes retrospects, implications, limitations and suggestions for further studies. The two media do have differences concerning the Diaoyu Islands dispute news editorials.  From  the  findings  above,  the  research  questions  posed  in  the  first  chapter can be answered as follows:  In  terms  of  pentad  analysis,  the  media  differ  from  each  other  in  selecting dominant  terms  so  that  they  have  totally  different  motives.  No  matter  what  term appears as the dominant term in their pentads, the motives of New York Times are the same—justifies  Japan  and  blames  China.  However,  the  motive  of  China  Daily  is always to defend itself on the basis of historical facts. With regard to cluster analysis, the two media also differ from each other. New York  Times  creates  more  and  stronger  terministic  screens  than  China  Daily  does. Chinese  editorials  are  more  mild  and  moderate,  which  may  not  generate  effective identification or persuasiveness as expected.  When  it  comes  to  identification,  differences  between  the  two  media  are  also obvious. New York Times adopts the strategies of identification much more frequently than  China  Daily  does,  both  in  identification  by  sympathy  and  in  identification  by antithesis.  But  China  Daily  is  more  in  favor  of  identification  by  sympathy,  which means that it lacks diversity of rhetorical strategies compared to New York Times. 
.........
The reference (omitted)
本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。