澳洲作业:恐怖主义政治的优势和弱点
The Strengths And Weaknesses Of Terrorism
巴斯维治评论了关于美国发现自己的冲突能力,来确定当前和未来的威胁,为将来做准备,许多州面临了困难,因为他们试图确定未来国家安全政策和策略。各国面临的挑战,反映在学术研究人员花了相当长的时间,精力和金钱,去试图解决所面临的同样问题。
在过去的十年里,一个特定的术语被用来描述对全球安全的最新威胁,“全球反恐战争”。 9月11日的事件带来了对恐怖主义主题研究领域的更大兴趣,自1968年以来增长了85%。据施密德和Jongman的研究 这一比例将在22年间大大增加。 令人惊讶的是,对恐怖主义的一个更大的研究不是在1920年进行的,因为考虑到第一次世界大战是由一个小和相对未知的无法无天的恐怖集团的行动开始的。 类似于叛乱,随着西方常规战争霸权的发展,该领域的力量日益增长,并且变得越来越广泛了。
本文旨在在最近的文献中,找出恐怖主义研究领域形成的最大的优点和缺点,它的热门是因为2001年世贸中心袭击,现在它有很大的发展。它将首先讨论恐怖主义的定义问题。它将辩论瞬态研究的习惯是否有添加或扰乱。
Bacevich's comments regarding the ability of the United States of America to understand the conflicts it finds itself, to identify current and future threats and to prepare for the future is a symbol of the difficulty facing many states as they try and identify how to prepare their future national security policies and strategies. The challenges faced by states are reflected in the difficulties faced by academic researchers who also spend considerable time, effort and money on trying to solve the same problem.
In the last ten years, a particular term has been used to describe the latest threat to global security, the 'Global War on Terror'. The events of September 11th have brought about a greater interest in the subject of terrorism, a field of study which has grown by 85% since 1968 (SCHMID AND JONGMAN, 1988). That percentage will have increased greatly in the twenty-two years since Schmid and Jongman's study. It is surprising to consider that a greater study of terrorism was not carried out in the 1920's, considering that the Great War was started by the actions of a small and relatively unknown anarchic terrorist group. Similar to Insurgency, the field grows in strength as it becomes more widely used by actors in resistance to Western States on a large scale as the development of Western conventional warfare hegemony has grown.
This
essay seeks to identify where the field of terrorism studies has developed its greatest strengths and its greatest weaknesses in recent literature (defined as post 2004) and to discover whether or not the field, as it has grown ever more popular since the World Trade Centre attacks in 2001 (FRIEDRICHS, 2006), has moved on and developed. It will first discuss the question of the definition of Terrorism. It will then debate whether the habit of 'transient researchers has added or detracted from the field.
Taking these two areas into consideration, it will consider the methodologies of Orthodox and Critical Terrorism studies and will show the development of new theories has been constrained by a use of secondary sources and the habit of 'lazy researching' (SILKE, 2004).Finally, overall it will attempt to balance the strengths and weaknesses in the field to identify the challenges facing terrorism studies.
It is important at this stage to try and define two key terms, Research and Terrorism. Research in itself is broken into three key areas; the exploratory, the descriptive and the explanatory (ROBSON, 1993). The effort of any field or discipline of study is to bring newly discovered information created from primary resources and
statistics, describe it to other researchers and interested parties and then use that information to explain why events happen and then use that information to form models and theories to predict w
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。