Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal
英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献
ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter
澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文
小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法
英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查
temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语
经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目
日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题
职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意
论文作者:留学生论文论文属性:硕士毕业论文 thesis登出时间:2023-11-28编辑:vicky点击率:553
论文字数:42522论文编号:org202311211130526347语种:英语 English地区:中国价格:$ 66
关键词:英语教学法论文范文硕士论文提纲
摘要:本文是一篇英语教学法论文,本研究在Schunn的“最近说服能力区”理论的指导下,试图探讨以下研究问题:1 )低水平学习者怎样通过吸收来自高水平学习者的反馈对自己的写作进行修改? 修改结果是什么? 2 )高水平学习者怎样通过吸收来自低水平学习者的反馈对自己的写作进行修改? 修改结果是什么? 3 ) 来自不同水平同伴的重叠反馈对修改结果有何贡献?
Chapter Six Conclusion
6.1 Major Findings
Guided by Schunn’s Persuasive Zone of Competence Theory, this study explored whether and how students of different proficiencies in the same class can benefit from peer comments. All the findings of the study are summarized as follows:
Firstly, both the two lower proficiency learners have revised their writing through peer review activity. They received both high and low-level effective feedback. Inspired by those peer comments, they have made more or less revisions to their first writing drafts. However, their revision outcome was different. Although the mean score of each writing task and the mean score of each dimension have all been improved, Kenny’s difference between the two drafts was not significant, with the sig.= 0.111>0.05. And there was also no significant difference between the first and second drafts of the four dimensions. While Lucy’s total scores of the two drafts, especially the scores of language skills dimension, was significantly different, with the sig.= 0.004<0.05. Through their reflection journals and interview analysis, it can be explained that learners’ learning attitudes and self-recognition greatly affect their revision outcomes. If learners can clearly locate their own problems, think modestly about the peer feedback they received and make effective learning plans, they can definitely benefit from peer comments.
Secondly, two high proficiency learners revised and benefited a lot at content level from peer review activity. Almost every assignment of Sandy got useful peer comments and he could also adopt them into his revision. The average score of his second draft and each dimension are higher than that of the first draft, which proved that Sandy has made effective revisions. The results of paired sample t-test showed that the total score of the first drafts and the revised drafts had a significant difference with sig. value of 0.049 < 0.05. The difference between the unity level and the coherence level was particularly significant, and the sig values are 0.033, less than 0.05. Peer review could always point out the key problems in his articles and promoted his effective revisions. Zara also received lots of effective peer comments. Her revisions triggered by peer feedback include all the four dimensions, and these revisions also contributed to the progress of her writing outcome. Like Sandy, her average score of the second draft is also higher than that of the first draft, and the difference is significant. Among them, only the difference at the support dimension is significant. It can be seen from her compositions that inspired by peer comments, she did make great changes to the content of the article. They said in their reflection journals and interviews that peer review opened their minds, prompted deep thinking and made them pay attention to problems they would not notice before. Undoubtedly, they benefited a lot from peer comments.
reference(omitted)
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。