英语论文网

only takes what is useful to prove his viewpoints, neglecting the others, some of which may prove just the opposite. What he is interested is hegemony of the West, the will of Europeans to conquer and rule the world.The study of imperialist romance in relation to Conrad finds, by contrast to the imperialist romance which advocates imperialism with outcry, Conrad’s works take a more critical attitude towards imperialist expansion. So those scholars tend to be more interested in his anti-colonialist discourse, neglecting the fact that both colonialist discourse and anti-colonialist discourse exist in Conrad’s fictions.Non-western criticism of Conrad’s colonialist discourse is represented by Chinua Achebi and Peter Nazareth. The former represent the angry Africans while the latter the Africans with gratitude. Achebi is angry because his race is described as inferior, while Nazareth is grateful to Conrad because he reveals to the reader the ugly deeds of the colonialists. Both sides raise passionate argument instead of rational analysis. None can convince the other, but none would admit the truth in the argument of the other side. Chinese scholars are also involved in the discussion of Conrad’s colonialist discourse, with the same weakness of emphasizing on the one side of the discourse while neglecting the other.This dissertation starts with the above weakness. With the methodology of cultural study, I try to associate Conrad’s construction of The Other with English literary tradition as well his duality in identity and unique experience, to clarify how they affect the way Conrad makes his construction, and how such construction contain a dual discourse for and against colonialist expansion. I also try to make analysis of his text on the basis of the dual discourse.The value of studying Conrad’s construction of The Other lies in its significance to the reality. The major method he employs for the construction of The Other, which he inherited from English literary tradition, is "reduction of The Other "and "de-otherness". If we apply it to test the course of action today by US and other western countries, we will find they are using the same method in international affairs as well as in the issue of cultural communication, though the western thought and philosophy have undergone a process from self-centered to other-centered in the relation between the self and The Other. Therefore, the study of Conrad helps to see clearly the nature of what is going on in the world today. At the same time, because the method of "reduction of The Other" and "de-otherness" is not ye out of date, Conrad’s criticism of imperialism is also still valid today.In the construction of The Other, Conrad inherited from English literary tradition "reduction of The Other "and "de-otherness", reducing the unfamiliar things to the discourse of the narrator, whose hermeneutics will facilitate his objective for the reader to understand. However, not all his construction of The Other can be reduced, some, though exist in the discourse of the narrator, even the narrator himself feels at a loss to mastery of it. Another thing that is unique of Conrad is, some of his " had native " will not get retaliation. Instead, they live a lucrative life to the end of the story. In traditional idea, the self turning to The Other is for the sake of recovering its self on a higher level, but in Conrad, sometimes the self can never recover its self again. " Going native ", the process of turning to The本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。