英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心 我要定制

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

权益保护法的权利的留学生作业 [5]

论文作者:英语论文论文属性:作业 Assignment登出时间:2014-10-12编辑:zcm84984点击率:11713

论文字数:3924论文编号:org201409201237377914语种:英语 English地区:加拿大价格:免费论文

关键词:Law EssayRight留学生作业权益保护法权利

摘要:本文是一篇关于权益保护法权利的留学生作业,宪法作为国家的最高法律,为公民提供了法律保护的权利。 [1]所有的人有权享受正当法律程序的权利。据认为,为了使正义得到切实有效地伸张,被指控犯罪的人,应该有一个迅速审判的过程。

Commonwealth Caribbean. She claims that the case showed a repeated failure on the part of the courts to give a generous and purposive construction to the Constitution. [21]

The Jamaican case of Dunkley and Robinson v R [22] also established that the right to legal representation is not an absolute right. The appellants were convicted of murder on July 21 1988 at the Circuit Division of the Gun Court and sentenced to death. At the trial, Dunkley’s lawyer had a disagreement with the judge and withdrew. He was left without representation for the remainder of the trial. The appellants applied for special leave to appeal to the Privy Council. Dunkley’s appeal was allowed while Robinson’s was dismissed. The principle laid down by the courts was where a defendant faces a capital charge and his left unrepresented through no fault of his own, the interests of justice require that in all but the exceptional cases there be a reasonable adjournment to enable him to secure alternative representation. [23] It was apparent that Dunkley was incapable of defending himself and the trial judge made no attempt to remedy the situation. Additionally, it was established in Dunkley v Robinson that the trial judge can only permit withdrawal if he is satisfied that the defendant will not be prejudiced.

Similarly in Mitchell v R [24] the court held that where the lack of representation was not due to any fault on the apart of the accused and the trial could not be properly satisfied that the accused would not (might not) suffer prejudice by the withdrawal of counsel, the conviction would be quashed on appeal on the ground that there should have been an adjournment to enable the accused to try to obtain alternative representative. [25] The court in Mitchell made reference to word “permitted” in s 20(6) (c) in the Constitution. Significantly, an accused person should be permitted to exercise his/her right to have counsel. It is postulated that the lack of counsel may put the defendant at a disadvantage as his/her case may be negatively affected due to the absence of skilled cross-examination by counsel. [26]

Outside of Caribbean jurisdiction, the right to legal representation is seen as an important right afforded to the accused. In Powell v Alabama [27] it was established that the failure of the trial court to give the defendants reasonable time and opportunity to secure counsel was a clear denial of due process. [28] In this case, the defendants were charged with the raping of two girls. The defendants, even though the record stated that they had been provided with counsel, had their trial conducted without one present. They were convicted and sentenced to death. The appeal was on the grounds that they were denied the right to counsel, with the accustomed incidents of consultation and opportunity of preparation for trial. [29] The relevant fact in this case was that the defendants had not been afforded counsel from the preliminary hearing until the beginning of their trial. It was reasoned by the courts that it was during this period that counsel was of vital significance as matters would be investigated and the case prepared.

In United States v Wade [30] the court held that it critical that defendants in criminal proceedings should be provided with counsel from the preliminary hearing to the trial. In this case, the respondent was indicted for robbery and conspiracy and without notice to his appointed 论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。
英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非