英语论文网

本文主要Pedantic (UK) Ltd从分析，由英国作业之英语论文代写策划组提供。

论文题目：Law and Commercial Transactions
论文语言：英语论文 English
论文专业：Law and Commercial Transactions

字数：1500
学校国家：英格兰
是否有数据处理要求：否
您的学校：英国约克大学
英国第九
论文用于：Master essay 硕士课程作业

If Pedantic (UK) Ltd now wishes to serve the formal termination notice and claim the liquidated damages, there are some difficulties that I should advice:

Firstly, the buyer does not pay instalment, which is not necessarily leading to termination of the contract. Whether Payment is the terms of the contract or the condition of the contract, in the case it is not clear. If the contract announces a specific term is the condition, usually the term will be seen as condition. The ability to divide terms into conditions may give the parter powerful weapon. From the case of Lombard North Central PLC v. Butterworth [1987] QB 527, can see this. A leasing computer contract in terms of 2 says each installment shall immediately be paid, which is the key element of the contract. The lessee does not immediately pay for a certain installment, so the lessor takes back the computer and filed a lawsuit to claim from the plaintiff. The appeal court thinks, the https://www.51lunwen.org/Economy/2011/0317/0946163842.html agreement to regard duly instalment as elements of the contract, can render enough that without pay a certain installment can constitute to refuse to fulfill the contract, so the plaintiff shall have the right to terminate the contract damages, not only about the day the debts of the termination of the contract, and in the future installments of loss (according to rent for the future growth of income discount). The court says that, the parties’right to divide a contract relative importance can not be restricted. This is also receiving the criticism, namely the principle "does not always lead to a satisfactory result" (Bijczuk, 1987), but Mustill justice refused to impose judicial limit on this punishing terms, based on the rationale, that will allow parties take the terms which may produce other results as a condition of the contract. And if adding the limit can make laws “back more than 100 years”.

References
Lombard North Central PLC v. Butterworth [1987] QB 527
Bijczuk, 1987
Schuler AG v. Wickman Machine Tool Sales Ltd [1974] AC 235
Behzadi v. Shaftebury Hotels Ltd [1992] CH 1
Re Olympia & York Canary Wharf https://www.51lunwen.org/law/ Ltd (No. 2) [1993] BCC159
The Naxos [1990] 1 WLR 1337
Behn v. Burness (1863) 3 B&S 751 and Bettini v. Gye (1876) 1 QBD 183
Boone v. Eyre (1777) 1 H BI 273). P173