英语论文网

ive evidence from theenvironment.For children’s VP-oriented interpretation,Crain et al.(1994)proposethat young children do not initially employ syntactic restrictions on the range or scopeof focus-sensitive quantifiers when formulating hypotheses concerning theinterpretation of a sentence.They argue that children associate the focus particle withthe VP of the sentences with only irrespective of the surface position of the quantifier.

CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY ...................... 18

3.1 Participants ............................. 18

3.1.1 SLI group ....................... 19

3.1.2 HFA group .................... 19

CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS........................... 28

4.1 Between-group comparison ....................... 28

4.2 Within-group comparison ............................... 33

4.3 Error analysis .......................... 34

CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSION ...................... 38

5.1 Result interpretation .......................... 38

5.2 Difficulties in the interpretation of focus structure .......................... 39

5.3 Processing limitation .............. 41

CHAPTER FIVEDISCUSSION

5.1 Result interpretation

On the basis of previous studies,the inclusion of the HFA-LN group matched onaspects of language abilities is also concerned and the performance of the fourcategories of children is interpreted here.

The results bore witness to the fact that the SLI children and the HFA-LI childrenwere significantly outperformed by the control children in both experiments and thatthe SLI group was indistinguishable from the HFA-LI group.The laggingperformance of the two clinical groups may stem from their overall delayed languageability compared to that of the TDA children and the difficulty in interpreting focusstructure and complex noun phrases.Taken together,these findings mirror what hasbeen reported in the literature for children with SLI and those with HFA-LI.Tager-Flusberg(2006)tries to distinguish between children with autism and thosewith SLI through the experiment of phonological processing and grammaticalmorphology.The result shows that patterns of performance among the HFA-LIchildren are similar to those of the SLI children,providing further evidence for thehypothesis that a subgroup of children with ASD has co-morbid SLI.She proposesthat these two groups display shared impairments at the morph-syntactic level.

CHAPTER SIXCONCLUSION

6.1 Summary of the study

The present study aims to explain profiles in the acquisition of complex noun phraseswith the focus particle zhi(only)between SLI children and HFA children.Acomprehension task including two experiments was administered in the current study.

As for the similarities,we found that compared with the normally developingchildren,both clinical groups demonstrated diminished comprehension in complexnoun phrases with the focus particle zhi(only).Both groups showed deficiencies ininterpreting NP,ModP,NumP focused by zhi(only).This may have to do with the factthat both groups had problems computing alt本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。