英语论文网

g. This may also bepartial reason of the occurrence of considerable clang responses and no responses.
Third, the classification of responses is a very difficult process. Differentclassification may result in different result. Although the criteria of classification in the present research were designed by referring to many other studies，they are far fromperfect. Some responses are dealt with uncertainty. Meanwhile, the classification wasdone by the researcher herself. Although this can ensure a consistent standard ofcategorizing the responses, some subjective judgments may influence the reliability ofthe research. A more perfect and scientific standard of classification shall be designed infurther studies.
To summarize, the thesis probes the issue of L2 mental lexicon and readingcomprehension. Proper ways of readings help to construct college students' mentallexicons to a great extent. As a major source of input，reading ability can be improvedby a reinforced mental lexicon network. On the contrary, being more efficient readers ofEnglish can help students to reconstruct and perfect their L2 lexicon network. Theinteractive relation between reading and mental lexicon building is revealed in theresearch. However, since mental lexicon theory is still a developing subject, more workis needed for new discoveries in the future.

References
1Hansen, L. & A. Reetz-Kurashige. 1999. Investigating www.51lunwen.org/reading/ second language attrition: Anintroduction [A]. In L. Hansen (ed.). Second Language Attrition in Japanese Contexts[C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 3-20.
2Hansen, L. & Yung-Lin, Chen. 2001. What Counts in the Acquisition and Attrition ofNumeral Classifiers? [J]. Japan Association for Language Teaching 23: 83-97.
3Hansen-Strain, L. 1990. The attrition of Japanese by English-speaking children: an interimreport [J]. Language Sciences 12(4): 367-377.
4Haspelmath，M. 2001. word classes and parts of speech [A]. In P. B.
5Baltes & N. J.Smelser (eds.). International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences [C].Amsterdam: Pergamon. 16538-16545.
6Jordens, P, K. de Bot & H. Trapman. 1989. Linguistic aspects of regression in Germancase marking [J]. Studies of Second Language Acquisition 11(2): 179-204.
7Keijzer，M. 2004. First language attrition: A cross-linguistic investigation of Jakobson’sregression hypothesis [J]. International Journal of Bilingualism 8(3): 389-393.
8Kennedy, L. R. 1932. The retention of certain Latin syntactical principles by first andsecond year Latin students after various time intervals [J]. Journal of EducationalPsychology 23(2): 132-146.
9Kopke, B. & M. S. Schmid. 2004. Language Attrition: The Next Phase [A]. In M. S.Schmid, B. Kopke, M. Keijzer & L. Weilemar (eds.). First Language Attrition:Interdisciplinary perspectives on methodological issues [C]. Amsterdam: JohnBenjamins. 1-43.
10Laufer, B. 1997a. What's in a word that makes it hard or easy: some intralexical factorsthat affect the learning of words [A]. In Norbert Schmitt & Michael McCarthy (eds.).2002. Vocabulary: Description，Acquisition and Pedagogy [C]. Shanghai: ShanghaiForeign Language Education Press. 140-155.

本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。