英语论文网

美国作业：Free Education免费教育

美国没有免费的教育，至少在更高的水平上。关于债务水平的提高已经取得了很多。有些人甚至呼吁实行免费教育。这将是一个重大的错误。它会减少大部分的普通人群的个人自由，减少质量，给学生发错误的信息。这篇文章将解释为什么。
首先，有人要为教育付出。在没有学生的时候，要提供高质量的教育是不可能的。有人要为它付出。如果不是学生们照顾他们的责任，那是纳税人，他们每年都要支付大量的助学金和奖学金给学生们。把这个重担放在一个完全靠人的肩膀上的决定是错误的。

使教育自由意味着钱必须从别处找到。政府可提供的唯一选择是在其他地方增加税收或削减服务。削减其他重要服务比让学生为教育付出更为公平。它不能解决这个问题，它只将问题转移到人口的另一部分。

增加税收来减少个人自由。经济自由与个人自由直接相关。通过削减可支配收入的税收，它减少了全国各地的家庭提供的选项。可以说，这样做是自私的，因为少数群体决定进入高等教育。

有人会说，让教育免费开放大学和大学，让更多的学生。这不是这样的情况。尽管教育不是免费的，但这绝不意味着人们被禁止进入高等教育。授予奖励成就已经存在的最佳学生。此外，绝大多数的学生都可以得到学生贷款来支付学费和保养。即使没有一个免费的学费制度，学生也没有障碍的进入高等教育的障碍。

The USA doesn’t have free education for students, at least at the higher levels. Much has been made about increasing levels of debt. Some people have even called for the introduction of free education. This would be a major mistake. It would decrease personal freedoms for much of the general population, reduce quality, and send the wrong message to students. This essay will explain why.

Firstly, someone has to pay for education. It’s physically impossible to deliver quality education while charging students nothing. Someone has to pay for it. If it isn’t students taking care of their responsibilities, it’s taxpayers who already pay for the substantial grants and scholarships awarded to students every year. It’s wrong to place this burden on the general population for a decision entirely resting on the individual’s shoulders.
Making education free would mean the money has to be found from elsewhere. The only options available to the government would be to raise taxes or cut services elsewhere. It’s no fairer to cut other vital services than it is to make students pay for education. It doesn’t solve the problem, it only shifts the problem onto another part of the population.
Increasing taxes to pay for education reduces personal freedoms. Economic freedom directly correlates with personal freedoms. By cutting disposable income through the raising of taxes, it reduces the options available for families across the country. Arguably, it’s selfish to do this because a minority group decides to go into higher education.
Some would argue making education free would open up colleges and universities to a greater number of students. This isn’t the case. Although education isn’t free now, this in no way means people are prohibited from entering higher education. Grants awarding achievement already exist for the best students. Furthermore, the vast majority of students can already receive student loans to pay for tuition and maintenance. There are no barriers to students entering higher education even without a free tuition system.
With the current student loan system, lenders are far more forgiving and the repayments are much lower than a conventional loan. The system already allows students to climb up the career ladder before they start to pay back significant amounts.
Cutting fees would also make it more difficult to continue to improve the standard of education within schools and colleges. If these institutions can’t make a profit from charging their students, they can only make enough to cover their maintenance costs. They can’t invest in themselves and boost standards. This would only lead to the continuing decline of American higher education facilities and make the country less attracti