不同水平学习者英语写作中模糊限制语使用对比研究 [4]
论文作者:www.51lunwen.org论文属性:硕士毕业论文 thesis登出时间:2017-04-04编辑:lgg点击率:5959
论文字数:36589论文编号:org201703311936238983语种:英语 English地区:中国价格:$ 66
关键词:英语教学论文英语写作语料库模糊限制语
摘要:本文是英语教学论文,基于英语专业语料库,本文旨在回答以下问题:不同水平的中国英语专业学生在考试作文中使用模糊限制语的情况;他们在作文中使用模糊限制语有什么不同,英语水平和使用的模糊限制语是否有相关性。
f pragmatics, hedges are categorized into property hedges (to help writer to express more correctly), possibility hedges (to express writer’s uncertainty about the utterance), author-oriented hedges (waive or reduce writer’s or speaker’s commitment to the utterance and truth commitment) and reader-oriented hedges (to attract readers to the world that author builds on and have consensus with author). According to the deep motivation behind hedges users, Hyland (1997) classifies hedges into content-oriented hedges and reader-oriented hedges. Hyland (1997) points out that the content-oriented hedges are used to ease the relationship between propositional content and non-language real psychology, and to blur the relative correspondence between the world that writers try to build on and the readers’ world; whereas the reader-oriented hedges are hedges that make confirmation with interactive concern in the author’s utterance, and cooperate with readers who are treated as the wisdom counterpart involved in the conversation construction. Therefore, Wu Guangting (2011) believes that content-oriented hedges have relation with the exactness degree of the built world; while reader-oriented hedges with author’s concern about the reader and academic behavior regularity in the field. In accordance with two different motivations: author to state opinion per reality and author to protect himself or herself by avoiding negative results because of uncertainty about the reality, Hyland (1997) divides content-oriented hedges into accuracy-oriented hedges and writer-oriented hedges, and then the accuracy-oriented divided into attribute hedges and reliability hedges. From Hyland’s classification of hedges, we can figure out that he emphasizes on the communicative function, which is an innovative breakthrough in hedges pragmatics research. However, the Hyland modular is not as popular as Lakoff’s (1972) and Prince, et al’s (1982) classification.
.......
Chapter Three Research Design ............ 22
3.1. Corpus and data ..... 22
3.2 Data collection and data analysis .... 23
3.3 Data grouping ......... 24
Chapter Four Results and Discussion ............... 25
4.1 Hedges used and distributed in the TEM compositions ..... 25
4.2 Relationship between the uses of hedges and English proficiencies of Chinese ............... 31
4.3 The possible reasons for the significant correlation between the use of hedges ..... 37
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。