英语论文网

An example of this bias can be Rich nations imposing high tariffs on the poor ones thus affecting the latter's exports. The imposition of non-tariff barriers such as anti dumping duties also hurt the poorer nations further highlights this issue. The richer nation's protection of agriculture is criticized while the poorer nations are pressed to open up their agricultural markets. Also, many countries do not have the capacity to flow the negotiations in the Uruguay round (Khor, 2002).

Khor argues that the Northern nations do not follow their contracts as perfectly as they should. He also says that the Doha round ventured from its initial proclamation of a development friendly negotiation to that of one in which the poorer nations were simply pressurized to open up their markets. However, according to Jagdish Bhagwati, there are also many tariff protection measures n the developing countries that are used to protect their own industries, Thus we see that discrepancies seem to be in both the hemispheres (Bhagwati, 2005).

Also, many analysts including Steve Chamovitz argue that the WTO should begin to address the issues of environment and labor as well. He argues that the gains from increased trade might be more than offset by the environmental damage they cause.

Steel example

However, no matter how much the WTO has been criticized, it is still respected among the world. In March 2002, the US government imposed a tariff of about 30% on all steel related imports from the EU. The tariffs were imposed when a US trade body found that there has been a surge in imports of related products from the EU. However, the WTO ruled out any tariffs and said that there was no real surge of imports. It is widely believed that the origin decision to impose the tariffs was originally based on winning the support the Virginia steel workers. But since the blatant breaking of WTO rules would be a taint on President Bushes upcoming election campaign, he dropped the tariffs. Furthermore, WTO regulations would mean that the EU would itself impose retaliatory tariffs and this would cost the US $2 billion annually. Thus we can judge the power the WTO still wields in the international trade arena from this incident.

Conclusion

Need Doha round conclusion.

Members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) continue to differ on the depth of liberalization required in the areas of agriculture and non-agricultural market access (NAMA), thus hindering the discussion of other important issues on the negotiating agenda, particularly services. To date, the negotiating groups have elaborated general formulas for cutting tariff s and reducing agricultural subsidies but differ sharply 本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。