英语论文网

Economists have been able to estimate the total costs and benefits of cutting CO2 levels since the early 1990's using quantitative forecasting models, and according to the International Panel on Climate Exchange, the various models produce similar results (Lomberg, 32, 2007). According to Lomberg, these models include all the costs of different effects from climate exchange, including the costs of agriculture, forestry, fisheries, energy, water supplies, infrastructure, hurricanes, drought damage, coastal protection, land loss, human and animal survival, pollution and migration. These costs are than weighed against the benefits, in terms of avoided damage from lower temperatures on the previously mentioned variables. The US used this model to assist in their decision to not participate in the Kyoto Protocol. The costs of being involved in Kyoto would have cost the US over $5 trillion in the coming century while the environmental benefit would have been a decrease in temperature of about three tenths of a degree Fahrenheit.

Society needs to understand the importance of prioritizing disasters and allocating resources accordingly. There are clearly many other worldwide, proven crises that are far more imminent and catastrophic than this speculative crisis of global warming, which is proven to be largely attributable to changes in nature. The World Health Organization found that one billion children are living in poverty worldwide (Lomberg, 43, 2007). 30,000 of these children die every day from famine, disease or inadequate resources to survive. That is over 10 million deaths a year from poverty. Another crisis is reflected in the 16 million children that are orphaned a year due to HIV/AIDS (similar to the total child population in Germany or the United Kingdom). 1.4 million children die each year from a lack of access to safe drinking water and adequate sanitation (Shah, 2006). These global crises illustrate conundrums far more deserving of immediate political attention. Assuming that our concern is how to advance human and environmental wellbeing, society needs to regain their perspective of the most effective ways to make the world a better place.

Conclusion

In the article “Global Warming Delusions”, biologist Daniel Botkin investigates many of the myths of the global warming debate. In this article, Botkin discusses many scientists with the similar belief that global warming is not a crisis. The only problem is that some of these scientists say “that the only way to get our society to change is frighten people with the possibility of a catastrophe, and therefore it is all right and even necessary for scientists to exaggerate” (Botkin, 2007). Exaggerate. Some scientists are not bothered when they exaggerate to us. One of these scientists said that “Wolves deceive their prey, don't they?” as a description of this form of embellishing the facts. It is disturbing to think that these scientists believe that it is morally acceptable to deceive and to exaggerate the facts in order to excite a majority of the public. 本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。