Social Work Essay-评价芬兰社会工作者
论文作者:www.51lunwen.org论文属性:短文 essay登出时间:2015-12-31编辑:dou1901点击率:8496
论文字数:1202论文编号:org201511082029229971语种:英语 English地区:芬兰价格:免费论文
关键词:FACSSocialvalue价社会工作者
摘要:本文主要是讲述FACS 和个人化议程之间有一个固有的张力,这个张力会给社会工作者带去导航,从而评价社会工作者,考虑他们怎么和服务用户建立友好关系。
Social Work Essay-评价社会工作者
这个不管怎样会被争议的,像顽固的筛选和评估系统,同时试图去使练习符合标准化,在一个包容的方式,为在他们自己的个人的语境之内被描述的服务用户提供小空间的透明度许可。亨伍德和哈得孙河(2008)提出因为这里有一个固有的张力,在FACS 和个人化议程之间。
这里有一些政府承认的关于FACS的缺点,涉及个人化,随着政府指导的介绍去寻求传递一个完整的系统,接近合理。(卫生署, 2010)。同时在一定程度上,不仅承认当地社会的需要,而且承认了个人的需要。它仍然需要社会工作者在严格的界限内操作,决定是否他们有一个合适的需要,因此成为有资格的通向一个资源。
这里有一个复杂的有张力的迷宫给社会工作者去导航她们自己通过。在一方面,她不得不去在医学模型框架之内工作,它规定标准和允许很小的灵活性仍然可以通向更多的资源。另一方面,她意识到需要去采用一个社会模型方法,在那个方法里,她应该重视和强调每个人的优势和独特性。张力在社会和医学模型之间对于社会工作是不新的,但是个人化议程挑战从业者去考虑他们的冲突。这个过程值得反思,像模型从业者的采用将告诉他们专业工作的概念化。
到目前为止,我们在尽力解决一些影响我们锻炼成为社会工作者的深层的价值观和理论。我们现在需要考虑我们要怎样与服务用户,他们的家庭和其他利益相关者建立友好的关系,按照支持个人来指导他们自己的支持。这个回答大概显得简单,“我们是合伙工作”,这个当然很容易说我们做这个,但是这个对于合伙工作实际上意味着什么?
Assessing The Dialemas Of Social Workers Social Work Essay评估社会工作者社会工作论文
It could be argued however, that such inflexible screening and assessment systems whilst attempting to standardise practice and offer transparency leave little space for service users to be described within their own personal contexts in an inclusive manner. Henwood and Hudson (2008) suggest there is an inherent tension between FACS and the Personalisation agenda in that
There has been some Government recognition of the shortcomings of FACS in relation to Personalisation with the introduction of government guidance seeking to deliver a 'whole system' approach to eligibility. (Department of Health, 2010). Whilst it goes some way to acknowledging local community needs as well as individual needs, it still requires social workers to operate within rigid boundaries in deciding whether they have an 'eligible need' and therefore become entitled to a resource.
There lies a complex maze of tensions for the social worker to navigate herself through. On the one hand she has to work within a medical model framework which dictates criteria and allows little flexibility yet may lead to more resources. On the other hand she is aware of the need to adopt a social model approach in which she should value and highlight the strengths and uniqueness of each person. The tensions between the social and medical model are not new to social work but the Personalisation agenda does challenge practitioners to consider their impact. This process is worthy of reflection as the model the practitioner adopts will inform their conceptualisation of the professional task.
So far we have tried to unravel some of the underlying values and theories influencing our practice as social workers. We now need to consider how we engage with service users, their families and other stakeholders in supporting individuals to direct their own support. The answer may appear simple 'we work in partnership' and it is certainly easy to say we do this but what does it actually mean to work in partnership?
Partnership between service users and professionals has long been established as a core component of social work practice. Legislation and government guidance has promoted the concept of partnership working in all aspects of social work from community care to child protection. Marsh and Fisher (1992) propose the principles upon which partnership is practiced include; user agreement, involvement, negotiated agreement and users having the greatest possible choice of the service offered. Pugh and De'Ath (1989) cited in Braye (2001) suggest partnership can be understood as a continuum from involve
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。