Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal
英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献
ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter
澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文
小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法
英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查
temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语
经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目
日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题
职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意
论文作者:英语论文论文属性:短文 essay登出时间:2014-11-07编辑:zcm84984点击率:12864
论文字数:3533论文编号:org201411062255204270语种:英语 English地区:马来西亚价格:免费论文
关键词:互联网诽谤留学生law essayInternet ProvidersDefamation
摘要:本文是一篇关于互联网诽谤的留学生law essay,关于诽谤的法律因为涉及到互联网所以一直是一个具有争议的话题。互联网用户在网络上潜在的诽谤性文章或评论创造了一个“不朽的老大难”。
Compuserve [34] was one of the principal US cases adopting libel law to an ISP rather than other traditional media [35] . In this case, the Court found no difficulty in establishing that a defamatory post in the ‘online library’ provided by Compuserve could not by any means give birth to liability upon the ISP. A few years later however, in a case with a similar set of facts, the US Courts adopted a conflicting view. In Prodigy [36] , the fact that the defendant concerned promoted itself as a new style-orientated ISP and asserted that he exercised editorial control over the content [37] had been fatal to his liability. Based on its capacity to filter the content of its site, the Court ruled that Prodigy was a ‘publisher’ and was therefore found liable for the online defamatory statements.
The inconsistency between the common law cases gave rise to s.230 of the Communications Decency Act 1996, which essentially overruled the Stratton Oakmont decision which found the ISP to be liable for the online defamation claim [38] . According to s.230(c), “no provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider” [39] .
It follows then, that since the enactment of this provision in 1996, the ISPs enjoy complete immunity as far as defamation on the Internet is concerned. However, the actual effect of this provision can only be apprehended through its application. Most notably, in the case of Zeran v. American Online, Inc [40] , the Court acknowledged that one of the main purposes of s.230 was, to an important extent, to preserve the vigorous nature of the online communication. As Chief Justice Wilkinson pointed out, it was a policy choice of the Congress to immunise service providers, and not to restrict harmful online speech through imposing libellous liability upon ISPs, since countenancing such liability would have presented the ISPs with undue and unfair burdens [41] . Moreover, the Courts in Zeran observed that the Congress’ intention in respect of the enactment of s.230 was to promote self-regulation by ISPs themselves in respect of defamatory content over their services [42] .
More importantly, when the issue of online defamation arose in the 1998 case of Blumenthal [43] , Judge Freeman took the opportunity to emphasise that the effect of the enactment of the s.230 provision was that ISPs are free from liability ‘even where the interactive service provider has an active, even aggressive role in making available content prepared by others’ [44] . It seems that after the ruling in Stratton, the court was not slow to appreciate the ‘chilling effect’ that a harsh attitude towards ISPs as regards defamatory statements may have on online communication. The US Congress statutory respo本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。