Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal
英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献
ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter
澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文
小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法
英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查
temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语
经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目
日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题
职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意
论文作者:英语论文论文属性:短文 essay登出时间:2014-11-07编辑:zcm84984点击率:12863
论文字数:3533论文编号:org201411062255204270语种:英语 English地区:马来西亚价格:免费论文
关键词:互联网诽谤留学生law essayInternet ProvidersDefamation
摘要:本文是一篇关于互联网诽谤的留学生law essay,关于诽谤的法律因为涉及到互联网所以一直是一个具有争议的话题。互联网用户在网络上潜在的诽谤性文章或评论创造了一个“不朽的老大难”。
As far as the U.K. is concerned, the service provider liability for carrying defamatory material is dealt with by s.1 of the Defamation Act 1996 [12] . In essence, the Act offers three specific ways by which an ISP can escape liability in relation to a defamation claim, which arose as a result of a libellous comment posted by an Internet user. In particular, if it can be proven that the ISP is not the “author, editor or publisher” of the defamatory statement, “took reasonable care in relation to its publication” and can provide evidence that it “did not know, and had not reason to believe that it caused or contributed to the publication of a defamatory statement” [13] , then it cannot be said to hold liability for the statement in question.
Even at first glance, the wording of the Act along with its natural and direct interpretation, not only seems to create an undue burden on the ISP defendant, but it is also obvious that the scope of protection that it provides towards the ISPs is strictly narrow; apparently, the UK legislation adapts the innocent disseminator defence to cyberspace, where the ISP’s role is purely passive and pertains only to the technical distribution of the defamatory material. What also appears to be problematic with the above provision is the lack of clarity in relation to the definitions of some of the terms used, such as ‘reasonable care’. However, in order to confirm the validity of such a severe criticism of the law, an analysis of post-1996 case law is more than required.
Godfrey v. Demon Internet, Ltd [14] , a case concerning a defamatory statement posted on an Internet bulletin board by an anonymous user, was the first to be decided under s.1 of the 1996 Act [15] . On the facts of the case, the Judges had no difficulty in deciding that Demon, the defendant ISP, did not fall, by any means, under the definition of the ‘publisher’ of the defamatory statement, as given under s.1(2) and s.1(3) of the 1996 Act. As Demon was held to be involved only in the technical part of the distribution of the statement, it was therefore entitled to take advantage of the innocent disseminator defence. So far, there is nothing surprising with the decision, since it would make no sense to say that Demon Ltd are in business as commercial publishers as statutorily defined [16] .
Nevertheless, things are not that simple from the ISPs perspective. The mere proof that the Internet Service Provider is not the publisher, author or editor of the defamatory material is not enough for them to establish their innocence. Beyond this, an ISP is also required to demonstrate that he took ‘reasonable care’ in relation to the statement and also that he ‘did not know or had no reason to believe’ that he caused or contributed to the publication of the statement’. It is therefore conceivable that If the ISP conc本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。