英语论文网

(Ashby, 1956), and biology (Richard, 1999 & Holland, 1992) can form the definition of complexity. Senge (1990) and Sterman (2000) explained that complexity consist of detail complexity and dynamic complexity. Number of elements in a system, number of connection between elements, and types of functional relations between elements are the subcomponents of the detail complexity (Milling, 2002). There are two types of complexity which is including external complexity and internal complexity. The external driver forces influence the forces of organization to internally build up complexity and it is the bi-directional influence between the two types of complexity (Bourgeious & Astley, 1979). The level of complexity and how the organization structured can is shape its complexity and the environment (Milling, 1991 & Child, 1992). Variety absorb variety is relate to the concept of the law of requisite variety as introduced by Ashby (1956). The matter of management decision laying the amount of complexity absorb by the company which is the exact borderline between the internal and external complexity (Moldoveanu & Baner, 2004).

Besides, thinking can create cultural problematic in organization. The factors that affect the cultural problematic organization is complexity thinking.According to Genelot (1998), a part of a company form is from the distinction of the individuals and their personalities, accompanied by a conjunction and setting in synergy with these elements from another logic which explained the dialogue principle. People are carrying a culture when they arrive in a company since the culture works them and it is the concept of the principle of recursivity. Larrasquet (1999) explained that advancement made in strategy of an organization doesn't exist. The principle of complex thinking only can dictate a strategy but cannot dictate a knowledge program (Berkirane, 2003). A guide to uncertainty and adapted to objective instead of universal method. It remains a work for researchers to adopt strategy in the principle of complex thinking (Morin & Le Moigne, 1999).

Organization performance has an effect on the complexity. The factors that contribute to organizational performance are self-organize and co-evolve. Continuously self-organize and co-evolve in all organizations with complex adaptive systems were suggested by complexity theory model (Capra, 1996 & Stacey, 1995 & Wheatley, 1992). Complex adaptive system made up of multiple interacting agents that exhibit complex, adaptive, and emergent behaviors (Brown & Eisenhardt, 1997). The organizations use information collect from the surroundings, themselves, and their own behavior for adapting to and co-evolving with the environments (Kauffman, 1995). The leading to adaptability of complex theory of organizations consist of large number of ties or connections, widely distributed are more capable of variety in their behavior (McDaniel & Walls, 1997 & Stacey, 1995 & Granovetter, 1973). The organizations will miss important data points, will oversimplified their view of what is happening in the environment, and unable to respond to the high level of variations without such variety (Weick, 1979). Organizations hold multiple and sometimes conflict representations of environment variety and retaining in their 本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。