英语论文网

n-public economies to tax revenue 30.55 million yuan , accounting for 76.4% of total tax revenue , to pay tax 9.56 million yuan , accounting for 48.5% of the total tax . The county town of new jobs over 70% of non- public ownership economy to provide , from the transfer of rural surplus labor force of more than 90% of the non -public economy to provide employment platform , the county more than 95% of laid-off workers, social idlers in various ways into individual , the private sector re-employment of 3250 people. ,

Reform and opening up three decades, along with the development of non-public economic policy environment , market environment, public opinion environment
Improved, rapid and healthy development of non-public economy . Non-public ownership economy gradually from small to big , from weak to strong development has entered a new period of development . In the county to promote economic growth and prosperity of urban and rural economy, increase tax revenue , expanding employment , transfer of rural surplus labor, promoting social harmony has played an increasingly important role. However , overall, non-public economic development from a low , weak infrastructure , production and management methods is relatively backward. Compared with the developed areas , either from the non-public economy total growth rate or from the scale are not a small gap.

In recent years , the county leaders at all levels to the development of non-public economy although awareness has increased, due to the traditional planned economy to non-public economy as alien stereotypes still exist , resulting in the non-public economic sectors cognitive bias , without the development of non-public ownership economy as the development of the socialist market economy and the urgent need to achieve leapfrog development of local economic strategic choice task, a sense of urgency and awareness is not strong , and even some wrong understanding . Some leading cadres of non -public ownership economy verbal attention, ignoring the actual work , no matter what specific problems encountered , some leading cadres dare confidently support non -public economic development , not to deal with the individual and private property owners that the public sector reform and development efforts to offer is perfectly justifiable , and support the development of non- public ownership economy , or fear of contact with the individual and private property owners more , the " sugar daddy " is suspected , the non-public entrepreneurs at arm's length . Some leading cadres of non -public enterprises are not treated equally , but the exclusion and discrimination. As the ideological understanding of the problems caused by leadership efforts, efforts inadequate support services are not in place, not conducive to the formation of non-public economic development momentum and public opinion environment .

The development of non-public enterprises from the county perspective, a considerable part of the non-public enterprise modern management system is not perfect , which is basically family management model, the vast majority of companies do not set up a standardized corporate governance structure , reasonable corporate organizational structure, internal powers and responsibilities are not clear, the command is not smooth, executive power is insufficient. A direct result of the low efficiency of business operations , the main and ancillary ac