Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal
英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献
ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter
澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文
小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法
英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查
temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语
经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目
日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题
职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意
论文作者:www.51lunwen.org论文属性:课程作业 Coursework登出时间:2015-12-05编辑:zhaotianyun点击率:6312
论文字数:1840论文编号:org201512041929122828语种:英语 English地区:英国价格:免费论文
摘要:本文主要讲述了会计研究的两种方法,分别是实证主义方法和关键方法,文中解释了这两种方法的概念。
会计研究的两种方法
The two approaches of Accounting research
实证主义方法和关键方法是会计研究的两种方法。本文解释了实证主义方法和关键方法的概念,然后解释了这两种方法的一些问题。本文讨论了会计研究之间的互动关系,会计准则和会计实务。本文通过研究发现,使用无形资产的案例说明了会计研究对会计准则的影响。其次,本文展示了会计准则会计实务的影响。第三,本文解释了会计研究与会计实践之间的互动关系。
实证主义方法和关键方法是会计研究的两种方法论。霍珀,戴维,Liyanarachchi和普雷斯科特(2008年,p20)描述了实证主义方法通常被认为是归纳和演绎的组合。积极研究方法的传统观点是理解和解决问题。积极的态度是经验主义的传统特点,逻辑和因果关系。这些特征通常被称为本体论、认识论和方法论特点的研究范式。积极的会计研究实验不作任何价值判断应该如何处事,描述“是什么”。近年来积极的方法就很重要。会计的关键方法研究并没有提供一个特定的方法或方法研究,而是辩证法和苏格拉底的方法来评价知识的索赔(p33 Hooper等,2008)。关键的研究集中在会计理论,是关心公司和公众之间的解决冲突。唯一的意识形态是对人性和人类的相伴和解放。批判理论提供了流程知识的考虑和评估赔偿不为研究者提供一个前进的方向。
计研究方法并不是相互排斥的,但这两个是互补的。
The positivist approach and the critical approach are the two approaches of accounting research. This article explains the concepts of positivist approach and critical approach, and then explains some of the problems of these two approaches. This article discusses the inter-relationship between accounting research, accounting standards and accounting practice. Through the research findings, this article use the case of intangible assets to illustrates how accounting research impact on accounting standards. Secondly, this article shows how accounting standards effects accounting practice. Thirdly, this article explains the inter-relationship between accounting research and accounting practice.
介绍——Introduction
The positivist approach and the critical approach are the two methodologies of accounting research. Hooper, Davey, Liyanarachchi and Prescott (2008, p20) described that the positivist approach is generally considered to be a combination of induction and deduction. The traditional view for the positive approach to research is to understanding and solving problems. The traditional characteristics of the positive approach are empiricism, logic and causality. These characteristics are often referred to as ontological, epistemological and methodological characteristics of a research paradigm. Positive accounting research experiments to describe 'what is' without making any value judgments as to how things should be. The positive approach has been important in recent years. The critical approach to accounting research does not provide a particular method or methodology for research but rather a dialectic and Socratic approach to the evaluation of knowledge claims (Hooper et al, 2008, p33). The critical research focus on the accounting theory that is concerned with resolving conflicts between the corporation and general public. The only ideology is the belief in humanness and the concomitant and emancipation of humankind. Critical theory offers processes for the consideration and evaluation of knowledge claims without providing a single way forward for the researcher.
These two accounting research approaches are not mutually exclusive but are complementary. Hooper et al (2008) states that the positive approach has a number of problems, such as lack of agreement on what the positive approach actually is; appeals to the authority of science but focuses on behavior and so on. The critical approach also has some problems, such as the critical research cannot generalize findings; critical research cannot predict or replicate studies. Both of these two theories have its own advantages and disadvantages, it is necessary to本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。