英语论文网

n used to discover the linguistic advantage of both sides in the cross-examination. In Wang Zhenhua’ study on the Simpson Case (2008), he discovered the interpersonal relation expressed during cross-examination. Based on the author’s analysis, it is concluded that objective speech with a positive attitude made the speaker stand on a rather advantageous position. On the opposite, subjective speech with an unclear attitude made the speaker stand on a less advantageous position. Systemic-Functional is also a method employed for the analysis of features of English in court debate. Gong Jing’s study took clause as its major unit for analysis, discussing the types of process of verbs as well as lexical choices employed in the transitivity processes (2005).  Findings  in  this  study  summarized  how  the  ideational  functions  are  realized through the processes and lexical choices. Studies have also been conducted focusing on the realization of persuasive reasoning in courtroom discourse from the perspective of transaction-oriented information processing. Du Jinbang tagged  the data  from  CLIPS to see the  distribution pattern of transaction-oriented information in courtroom discourses (2010). Elaboration was conducted on the pattern  of  information  distribution,  the  linguistic  realization  of  transaction-oriented information and its function and attitudes expressed in information processing. The author believes that proper use of transaction-oriented information can improve the effects of persuasive reasoning. 
.........

2.2 Overseas Researches on This Study
The influence imposed by attorney varied with the pattern of questioning. The pattern of questioning  showed  the  character  of  forcible  typology.  A  specific  questioning  pattern would lead to a particular response, which is of coerciveness. For example, a declarative question  such  as  tag  question  (it  is  you  who  did  this,  isn’t  it?)  is  of  the  strongest coerciveness  (meaning  strictly limited  the  possibility  of  witness’s  acceptable  response, even pointed out the response), however an open-ended wh-question, such as who, what, where, when and why showed rather light sight of coerciveness. Here what Danet (see Berk-Seligson, 1990) and his colleague chose as the metric to measure the strength of coerciveness is the length of the response. The more coercive is the question, the shorter the response is offered by the witness. A strongly coercive question such as a tag question tended to generate a “yes/no” response, which normally is rather short, while an open-ended wh-question frequently leaded to a rather long response, which is of long sentence or several sentences combined as a narrative discourse. 
........

CHAPTER THREE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK .... 12 
3.1  An Overview of Critical Discourse Analysis ...... 12 
3.2  Fairclough’s Three-Dimension Framework for Discourse Analysis ....... 13
3.3  Analytical Framework .... 19 
CHAPTER  FOUR  ATTITUDES  EXPRESSED  BY  PROSECUTOR  AND  DEFENDANT  TOWARDS...... 20 
本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。