Proposal Guidance Note for SBIT Proposals [17]
论文作者:51lunwen论文属性:作业指导 assignment guidelines登出时间:2009-11-18编辑:anne点击率:35297
论文字数:论文编号:org200911181618082746语种:英语 English地区:英国价格:免费论文
关键词:Proposal Guidance NoteSBIT ProposalsProblem SettingERP etcStrategic decisions
showing they did not look up any of the references.
Student Example - I include this example to show what a student submitted but it is easily seen to be of the poorest kind and lacks any real thought specifically about his/her outcome and practice. The student wrote:
I will evaluate my project outcome and practice by:
1) Listing down criteria for evaluation
2) Evaluating the mentioned/chosen two or three Information Systems based on these criteria
3) Presenting the evaluation results in suitable formats
4) Interpreting these evaluations results in a clear and unambiguous way and show how a computerized approach has really benefited the Human Resource Manager at Accenture Mauritius Limited.
Notice - there is no mention of what the outcome is so we have no idea what this student is talking about and I cannot see even a hint he is even aware about evaluation of practice. If one is honest here all the student has done is restate or explain what the question is asking so it has nothing of value in it. For example, item 1 says “Listing criteria” but it is very hard to see that is anything more that a rewording of the question.
Example
This is an extended example(double what you are allowed) because I am trying to let you see my thinking but much of what I say here would be ‘understood’ but to help you I have filled out the details. Suppose my outcome is a policy (it might be about anything) of some kind and it was generated deductively by using a survey vehicle made up of interviews and a questionnaire. So the focus of my evaluation is on the way I gathered the data and processed it to get my intended policy outcome and then on the outcome itself. Therefore as a plan I might write as follows where it is best to start with evaluation of practice then evaluation of the outcome but the two phases are connected so don’t be afraid to move back and forth from one to the other as you proceed.
Change Aims - The Policy will be designed to bring about procedural changes and it is hoped attitudinal ones across several departments and in that sense it is hoped that this new policy will prove to be functionally sound and if that is the case it is likely to be systemically desirable as well as culturally feasible though one must always be aware that if this change is ethically sound
Practice Evaluation - My main focus will be on the sample collected to consider on refection how well it met the criteria I set and explain any weaknesses or deviations found during processing and whether they were due to design, misunderstanding or collection errors. Of particular concern will be whether my deductive choice of data was adequate and focused based on my theory for this particular policy and I will do this by a careful consideration of the answers against the theory obtained from the sample as this may furnish me with explanation or descriptions of where any weaknesses might lie and of course validate my choices.
Processing data using template analysis for the interview and relatively simple statistics for the questionnaire has been planned and during evaluation I will review the efficacy of these choices based on the difficulty I might find in producing an adequate (meaning useful) interpretation of the data as presented and hence hopefully arrive at constructive insights and explanation by means of which these mechanisms might have been enhanced and also if necessary to consider making changes to my outcome or q
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。