英语论文网

in accordance with the appropriate model of action’’
 
Closely related to the compliance the Bretton Woods obtain from nation-states, NGOs also use tactics to model the states after internationally recognised principles. The efforts of NGOs and the Norwegian government to advocate the ban on landmines is a case in point.
 
Beside the clear forms of economic regulation, the conventional concept of political democracy is still emerging. However, the concept of democracy makes more understanding when it is view more as a system that affords participants the opportunity to deliberate, agree and disagree over common issues facing them and collectively seek for ways out of complex situations. This is the central theme of democracy and not elections. Base on this, an action is considered legitimate if it is a product of deliberation amongst the people subjected to it. (Dryzek, J; 1999, 43).
 
This perspective makes sense when applied to global governance as most actions are the outcome of deliberation. Though decisions of these deliberations are applicable across national boundaries, the greatest criticism against the process is the selective nature of actors involve in decision making.
 
Going by the appellation of governance not government could signify that the system is only an alliance to regulate people who voluntary subscribe to it. Ironically, countries are reluctantly giving up their authorities to join the collective assurance. Those who refuse to flow with the overwhelming system stand the risk of denying themselves assistance in times of complex emergences.
 
Under this system of global governance, development and security are merged as issues on the same coin and efforts to address crises emanating from them are given a multidimensional blend that will foster development in a secured environment and guarantee security in a developed region. This policy focus is reflected in the way global governance responds to conflicts in as captured below.
 
The New Humanitarian Intervention Approach
 
Similar to the decentralised system of governance, the new wars are intrastate and spreading across national borders to form a regionalised system of instability. Rather than tolerate these conflicts, a new humanitarian approach has being adopted to contain and neutralise international instability (Duffield 2001.78).
 
The old humanitarian intervention based on the principles of human rights and a universal right to humanitarian aid by victims of war has been criticised of prolonging and fuelling conflicts instead of resolving it. The intervention in Somali in 1992 is a case in point. To combat the new wars, a new humanitarian approach has being adopted.
 
The new imperialism or Liberal peace is of the view that conflict is best approached with a harmonised effort achievable through conflict resolution and prevention, reconstructing social networks, strengthening civil and representative societies, promoting rule of law and security sector reform.
 
This process will restore peace and lay a foundation for a functioning market economy. According to Duffield, though this posture gave aids agencies limited access to civilians in conflict zones, it was embedded with difficulties and produced poor results.
 
Aid agencies during 本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。