Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal
英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献
ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter
澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文
小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法
英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查
temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语
经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目
日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题
职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意
论文作者:bluesky论文属性:职称论文 Scholarship Papers登出时间:2013-03-10编辑:bluesky点击率:4972
论文字数:11039论文编号:org201303091854379267语种:中文 Chinese地区:美国价格:$ 22
摘要:随着互联网的广泛的使用,今天的信息可以帮助供应商能够进入新的市场。互联网提供了很大的便利,您的信息传播到世界的任何一个角落。
Riley (2010) describes that copyright is the legal right of the publisher, composer, author or any other creator of the work to exclusively publish, disseminate, print or perform the work in the public. There is option for the author or the publisher to grant the right or license to others to perform the same activities. Roddel (2008) is of the view that internet and computers are just tools. She further explains that before the availability of computers to household, people used to enjoy music at concert hall and then listened to records and the radio. It was not possible to make a copy of those songs or records and then share them with the others. Now people have the technology to reproduce and copy material at reasonable cost using the tools of computer and the internet.
It is said that the reproducing the copyrighted works without the permission of the owner, author, publisher or the creator of that work is wrong and is against the law when fair use limitations are transcended (Roddel, 2008). According to Professor Alfred C. Yen (Yen, Internet Service Provider Liability for Subscriber Copyright Infringement, Enterprise Liability, and the First Amendment, 2000), the present condition is that even if the content providers detect infringement and sue the suspects, they cannot get a satisfying outcome due the fact “in most cases, the costs of trailing reparation offset the expected recovery, or even worse, the infringer cannot be found.” Furthermore it is assumed that another possible reason that the copyright holders go uncompensated is that they usually pursuit the individuals, among most of which are students of the colleges or the universities, or amateurs, as ordinary people with no money and less awareness of the issues related copyright acts and laws. Therefore, even the infringers pay the amount of the fine, downloading and sharing of illegal content will continue as it is.
In many cases of the online copyright issues and infringement, the information or content providers seek to hold responsible the internet service provider (ISP), website operator, or bulletin board service (BBS) operator as well as the individual personnel who uploaded or download infringing material (Smith, 2007). Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are also held responsible for such liability because of the fact that the risk of copyright infringement is a natural by-product of the service of the internet (Yen, Article: Internet Service Provider Liability for Subscriber Copyright Infringement, Enterprise Liability, and the First Amendment, 2000). In the current internet era, it has been observed that Internet Service Provider (“ISP”) has a vulnerable position as the apparent legal risk to internet service providers is that the people who provide content will be using the ways which attracts legal liability (Bernstein & Ramchandani, 2002). The principle of fault liability of the internet copyright infringement states that internet service provider is responsible for the four elements: the act of copyright infringement, the result of violations, the link between the act and results, and the subjective fault (Shen & Huang, 2011). It is also believed that ISP may have to take some responsibility for the copyright infringement just because of simply providing the 本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。