Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal
英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献
ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter
澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文
小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法
英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查
temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语
经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目
日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题
职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意
论文作者:www.51lunwen.org论文属性:硕士毕业论文 thesis登出时间:2013-03-13编辑:hynh1021点击率:6581
论文字数:12300论文编号:org201303101941462268语种:英语 English地区:中国价格:免费论文
摘要:本文将采用中国传统的农历测试结果的季节性。三月和十一月作为比较基准,无论是股票收益率还是流动性之间关系影响这两个月的影响,但是根据农历,这两个月既包括传统的春节也包括中国会计结对算的时间安排。
Literature Review文学评论
In 1986, Amihud & Mendelson made the first contribution for the study on the relationship between different level of liquidity of stocks and the corresponding required rate of returns. In their paper, the bid-ask spread ratio is adopted as proxy of liquidity and the empirical results show that the liquidity of the securities is negatively related to its return (Amibud & Mendelson, 1986). After their works, many scholars follow the same methodology or adapt to employ new proxy for the liquidity such as trading volume per daily, firm-level quoted bid-ask spreads and price-weighted liquidity ratio to test effect of liquidity using the data that most of them comes from the developed financial markets (Brennan, 1998; O’ Hara, 2003; Glascock & Hung, 2008). Similar works for negative liquidity-return relations depending on different proxy of liquidity also have as follows like, Watanabe et al (2008) employ proxy of two distinct liquidity betas states (high or low) to study the effect of aggregate liquidity fluctuations to stock returns. Because the high liquidity-beta state is valid in the short-time period and characterized by heavy trade, high volatility, and a wide cross-sectional dispersion in liquidity betas, scholars adopt liquidity risk premium, amounting to more than twice the value premium, as robustness tests to explain whether the pricing of liquidity risk vary over time and prove the previous assumption but have an additional condition limit, that it, the high liquidity-beta state exactly represents high volatility and a wide cross-sectional dispersion in liquidity betas prior to a period of declining expectations about future market liquidity; similarly, high liquidity-beta state is lived shortly and even occurs less than one-tenth of the time (Watanabe et al, 2008). In order to eliminate bias, scholars assume to use order flow data to investigate the effect of liquidity to stock return across liquid and illiquid trading in the high liquidity-beta state and multivariate dynamics of liquidity, volume, and volatility effect to asset pricing in the later study (Watanabe et al, 2008). Pereira and Zhang (2007) are actually practical proof and reinforce the theory proposed in Chordia, Subrahmanyam and Anshuman (2001) literature. This paper provides an empirical analysis to consolidate liquidity-return relation analysis through modeling liquidity as a stochastic price impact and liquidity premium as the additional return that compensate a multi-period investor due to the adverse price impact of trading, especially captures the point on liquidity variation over time本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。