英语论文网

because only one part is well or badly-designed. Therefore, futureresearchers may try to make a holistic and comprehensive comparative analysis betweenthe two tests, covering all parts of the tests.Lastly, the results of the study may lack accuracy and preciseness. Although mostdata are analyzed both manually and automatically with the help of the computer to makethe results consistent and objective, yet some mistakes are unavoidable due to somesubjective classifications and the relatively superficial understanding of someprofessional knowledge.

Bibliography
1Baker, D. Language Testing: A Critical www.51lunwen.org/englishpaperguide/ Survey and Practical Guide[M]. London:Edward Arnold Press, 1989.
2Benjamin, B. G. Jr. Testing reading comprehension of theoretical discourse with cloze[J].Journal of Research in Reading, 2001 24:82-98.
3Brown, J.D. Understanding Research In Second Language Learning[M]. Cambridge:
4Cambridge University Press, 1988.Croft, K. Language testing today: an interview with John Oiler. In Croft, K. (ed.)，Reading on English as a Second Language[M]. Cambridge: Winthrop Publishers,1980.
5Carrell, P.L. et al(ed) Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading[M]Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
6Cambridge Books for Cambridge Exams: IELTS 8[Z], Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress, 2011.
7Cohen, A.D. Assessing Language Ability in the Classroom[M] Beijing: ForeignLanguage Teaching and Research Press, 2005.
8Goodman, K.S. Reading: a psycholinguistic guessing games [A]. Theoretical Models andProcesses of Reading(Second edition) [M]. Eds. Singer, H. and Tuddell, R. Newark,DE: International Reading Association, 1976.
9Grellet, F. Developing Reading Skills[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
10Grotjahn,   R.   Test  validation  and  cognitive  psychology:   some methodologicalconsiderations [A]. Language Testing[C]A9S6.

本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。