Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal
英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献
ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter
澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文
小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法
英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查
temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语
经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目
日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题
职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意
论文作者:www.51lunwen.org论文属性:硕士毕业论文 thesis登出时间:2017-08-26编辑:lgg点击率:11002
论文字数:38596论文编号:org201708191500419007语种:英语 English地区:中国价格:$ 66
摘要:本文是大学英语教学论文,本研究旨在验证翻转课堂模式在中国大学英语口语课堂中的有效性,即该模式是否有助于提高学生的英语口语水平和自主学习能力,并探究学生对翻转课堂教学模式的态度。
In this study, pre-test is conducted in the first two weeks, and the results are analyzed as follow to show students’ proficiency in spoken English. The comparison between CC and EC is conducted to examine whether there is obvious difference between students’proficiency with the aid of Independent Sample Test. The results are presented in the following table. As shown in Table 4-1, the mean scores of EC and CC are 22.890 and 23.228 respectively, so the gap between the scores is not tiny. The results reflect the similar level of spoken English proficiency of the subjects in the two classes. Moreover, the standard deviation of EC and CC are 2.377 and 2.299, which shows the distribution of scores in the two classes is approximate. Table 4-2 analyzes the results of pre-test in CC and EC. As is shown in the table, P=0.447 > 0.05, so there is no significant difference between the spoken English proficiency of students in CC and EC before the experiment.
..........