Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal
英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献
ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter
澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文
小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法
英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查
temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语
经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目
日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题
职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意
论文作者:代写留学生论文论文属性:硕士毕业论文 thesis登出时间:2011-04-27编辑:zn1987点击率:4461
论文字数:989论文编号:org201104271106183352语种:英语 English地区:美国价格:免费论文
关键词:CreditorsInsolvencyJerseyMinority shareholdersUnfairly prejudicial conduct
It follows that, as long as the petitioner is nominally a member, relief can be sought qua investor(where the investment is a combination of equity and loan) and not merely qua member.
The decision will no doubt be welcomed by investors such as private equity providers. It can be
supported by reference to established principles, notably the principle that “membership interests”
should be construed more broadly than strict legal rights under the corporate constitution. Nevertheless, Gamlestaden Fastigheter may prove to be an exceptional case. The usual course in
such circumstances is for the company to be wound up and the liquidator to pursue its cause of
action against the directors for the benefit of creditors.
1. [2007] UKPC 26, [2007] B.C.C. 272.
2. Restated as Companies Act 2006, ss.994-996 (due in force on October 1, 2007).
3. (1843) 2 Hare 461. See further the Privy Council's advice in Gamlestaden Fastigheter, above fn.1, [22].
4. Pavlides v Jensen [1956] Ch. 565. Once the Companies Act 2006, ss.260-264 come into force this will no longer be an obstacle to a statutory derivative action (which may be premised on “a cause of action arising from an actual or proposed act or omission involving negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust by a director”).
5. Relief under the equivalent of s.461(2)(c) in the form of an order authorising Gamlestaden to bring civil proceedings against the directors in Baltic's https://www.51lunwen.org/liuxuelunwendx/name was not pursued because of concerns that any fresh derivative action would have been time-barred under Jersey law:see Gamlestaden Fastigheter, above fn.1, [25]. Presumably, a second derivative action would not have been res judicata because the scope of the civil action that the court can authorise to remedy ‘unfair prejudice’ is broader than that available under the common law exception to Foss v Harbottle.
6. Delivering the Privy Council's advice, Lord Scott of Foscote prayed in aid the decision of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal in ReChime Corp Ltd (2004) 7 H.K.C.F.A.R. 546. It is suggested that Anderson v Hogg 2002 S.L.T. 354 and Clark v Cutland [2003] EWCA Civ10, [2004] 1 W.L.R. 783 at [8] also support this conclusion.
7. Gamlestaden Fastigheter, above fn.1, [33].