Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal
英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献
ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter
澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文
小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法
英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查
temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语
经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目
日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题
职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意
论文作者:英语论文网论文属性:职称论文 Scholarship Papers登出时间:2012-03-21编辑:shayne fan点击率:7497
论文字数:1200论文编号:org201203211119068960语种:英语 English地区:英国价格:免费论文
关键词:Anti-Suit InjunctionsArbitrationLaw
摘要:关于在欧盟的反诉讼禁令和仲裁。英国下议院发表对油轮公司作出的判决。围绕案件的问题是欧盟会员国的法院是否可以给予仲裁协议的约束或起诉
CONCLUSIONS https://www.51lunwen.org/InternationalBusinessLaw/2012/0321/1119068960.html
The decision to refer the question to the ECJ hasitself provoked some debate. There is real concernthat, if the ECJ rules that the courts of MemberStates cannot issue anti-suit injunctions to restraincourt proceedings in another EU state which arebeing commenced/prosecuted in breach of anarbitration agreement, this may have far-reachingimplications for arbitration in the whole of the EU.The English courts' historical willingness to orderanti-suit injunctions has contributed to theattractiveness of London as a forum forinternational arbitration. If the ECJ's generaldistrust of anti-suit injunctions is extended toarbitration, the likely losers in an arbitration mayseek to derail the whole process before it hascommenced by starting litigation in anotherMember State court where proceedings movemore slowly.This would result in the extra expense of two setsof proceedings in two separate places, with the riskof conflicting decisions. Further, the existence of litigation may prevent a successful claimant inthe arbitration from enforcing its award in thecourt where the litigation is proceeding.As a result of these uncertainties, parties may bedissuaded from using arbitration to resolve theirdisputes or at least from nominating London and/orany other EU venue as the seat of their arbitration.Some of these concerns were highlighted by LordHoffman, in making the referral to the ECJ, whenhe said:“But perhaps the most important consideration is thepractical reality of arbitration as a method of resolvingcommercial disputes. People engaged in commercechoose arbitration in order to be outside the proceduresof any national court. They frequently prefer theprivacy, informality and absence of any prolongation ofthe dispute by appeal which arbitration offers. Nor is itonly a matter of procedure. The choice of arbitrationmay affect the substantive rights of the parties, givingthe arbitrators the right to act as amiablescompositeurs, apply broad equitable considerations, evena lex mercatoria which does not wholly reflect anynational system of law. The principle of autonomy ofthe parties should allow them these choices.”It remains to be seen whether the ECJ takes noteof these concerns. Nevertheless, their decision willbe本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。