西方国家应努力降低移民门槛|代写英国作业
论文作者:www.51lunwen.org论文属性:作业 Assignment登出时间:2017-04-14编辑:cinq点击率:4577
论文字数:2000论文编号:org201704140947464532语种:英语 English地区:英国价格:免费论文
关键词:英国作业代写essay移民欧盟
摘要:本文是英国留学生作业范文,是欧盟与国际政策相关课程,主要是针对西方国家移民问题提出应该努力降低移民门槛的原因。
对经济的不利影响只是一种想象的心理思维。现实是,移民为国家贡献了自己的工作。当
西方国家的人认为他们的富裕国家吸引穷人时,自私就暴露了。他们希望以某种方式维护自己的国家共同体,他们只愿意为本国人民负责,而不是来自其他国家的移民。。他们持有这样的意识形态,即移民正在减少福利和使用公共资金。研究发现,受访者不把移民作为他们的“经济竞争”。如从2013年neoruss调查数据,俄罗斯超过50%的受访者认为移民需要在俄罗斯,因为他们拿低工资的工作,这是俄罗斯人的生活重要,但是俄罗斯人不愿意做的工作。结果,移民实际上贡献了劳动力,但不仅花了国家的金钱和福利。研究发现,兼职工人对移民采取更严厉的态度,而全职工人更宽松。正如讨论的那样,移民对经济的负面影响只是自私的想象的投机。这并不真的存在。可以看到的是低收入工作的劳动力投入。受过高等教育的受访者对移民表现出更大的容忍度。知识渊博的人应该更多地了解移民对国家的总体利益和危害。这可能意味着移民不会对国家不利,不支持各国经济。
欧洲各国的移民主要表现为消极情绪。他们被视为威胁到经济、文化和社会安全。由于欧洲人对移民的负面形象,右翼政党把握机会加强对移民的负面观念,推动更严格的政策出台。然而,如果我们深入研究移民对当地社会和国家的影响,则发现经济、稳定、文化等方面的负面影响是有限的。因此,我认为西方国家应该努力降低移民门槛。
Negative sentiments are mostly shown towards immigrants across European countries. They are regarded as threat to economy, culture and society safety (Semyonov and Gorodzeisky, 2006). Because of the negative images of the Europeans on the immigrants, the right leaning political parties grasp the chance to reinforce negative notions on immigrants and promote the introduction of stricter policies towards them (Rustenbach, 2010). However, if we examine deeply on the effects of immigrants on local community and the overall countries, the negative influence on economy, stability, culture is found to be limited. Therefore, I think the western countries should work to reduce the threshold of immigration.
Adverse effects on economy is just an imagined psychological thinking. The reality is that the immigrants contribute to the countries with their work. Selfishness is exposed when people in the western countries think that their rich countries attract the poor. They want to maintain their national community in a way that they are only willing to be responsible for the people originally inside their countries, but not immigrants from other countries. (Waldinger, 2010). They are holding the ideology that the immigrants are spending off their welfare and using their public funds. Research found that respondents do not regard immigrants as their “economic competition” (Careja and Andreß, 2013). As indicated from the survey data of the 2013 NEORUSS, more than 50% of the respondents in Russia think that migrants are needed in Russia because they take up low-paid jobs which are important to the life of Russians but the Russians are not willing to do those jobs. As a result, immigrants actually contribute to the workforce, but not only spend the nations’ money and welfare. It is found that part-time workers took harsher stances towards the immigrants while full-time workers are more lenient. As discussed, the negative effects on economy due to immigrants are just the selfish imagined speculation. This does not really exist. What can be seen is the input of workforce for low-paid jobs. Respondents with higher education show greater tolerance to the immigrants. The knowledgeable people should know more about the overall benefits and harms of the immigrants done to the countries. This may imply that immigration is not detrimental to the countries, not support the countries’ economies.
Safety problems still exist even the number of immigrants is reduced to zero. According to quantitative research, a large proportion of the French believe that “immigrants increase crime” (Waldinger, 2010). In Australia, the result is similar. Nearly 50% of the “white” Australian agreed with the statement (Bilodeau and Fadol, 2011). In the USA, about 40% of the residents thought that the immigrants “significantly increase crime” in 1997. Ho
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。