英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心 我要定制

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

美国经济学论文

论文作者:英语论文论文属性:硕士毕业论文 thesis登出时间:2014-08-29编辑:yangcheng点击率:20009

论文字数:5981论文编号:org201408252319303927语种:英语 English地区:日本价格:免费论文

关键词:进口代替时代外国直接投资经济学论文economics essay

摘要:在本文中,我们主要关注了外国直接投资,并且认为,,巴西和印度两国的外国直接投资政策的对比可以追溯到19世纪,那时的各自的殖民地或半殖民地经验的差异。通过我们对巴西和印度的外国直接投资的比较分析,说明了历史和制度认知的重要性,这有助于理解每个社会感知外国投资在他们的社会中所扮演的角色的方式。通过这样的行为,我们得到了一种关于这些国家对外国投资采取不同的态度和政策原因的理解。

美国经济学论文

在本文中,我们主要关注了外国直接投资,并且认为,,巴西和印度两国的外国直接投资政策的对比可以追溯到19世纪,那时的各自的殖民地或半殖民地经验的差异。通过我们对巴西和印度的外国直接投资的比较分析,说明了历史和制度认知的重要性,这有助于理解每个社会感知外国投资在他们的社会中所扮演的角色的方式。通过这样的行为,我们得到了一种关于这些国家对外国投资采取不同的态度和政策原因的理解。

自亚当•斯密的时代开始,制度与经济发展的关系一直是发展经济学的中心。最近人民对这个领域的兴趣正在复苏。诺斯(1991,第97页)将制度定义为“人类设计的对政治结构、经济和社会相互作用的约束。他们都是由非正式约束(制裁、禁忌、习俗、传统和行为准则),和正式规则(宪法、法律、产权)所组成的”。

FDI In The Import Substitution Era Economics Essay

In this paper we concentrate on FDI and argue that the contrasting FDI policies in Brazil and India can be traced back to differences in the respective colonial (or semi-colonial) experiences of the two nations during the 19th century. Our comparative analysis of FDI in Brazil and India shows the importance of historical and institutional awareness in gaining an understanding of the manner in which each society perceived the role of foreign investments in their societies. By doing this, we gain an understanding of the reasons these countries adopted different attitudes and policies towards foreign capital.

The relationship between institutions and economic development has been at the center of development economics since the times of Adam Smith. Recently there has been a resurgence of interest in this area. North (1991, p. 97) defines institutions as ‘humanly devised constraints that structure political, economic and social interaction. They consist both of informal constraints (sanctions, taboos, customs, traditions and codes of conduct), and formal rules (constitutions, laws, property rights)’. Given the inherent uncertainty and complexity of modern economies, appropriate economic institutions make markets more efficient. This is also the case of foreign direct investment (FDI), as has been stressed in the literature (Dunning 1998, Görg 2005, Busse and Hefeker 2007, Meon and Sekkat 2007, Seyoum 2011).

For those who believe that “institutions matter”, two questions emerge: How do alternative institutional arrangements affect the quality and pace of economic development? How do such institutions emerge in the first place? The answer to the first question may be obtained by comparing alternative experiences. The answer to the second questions requires a historical perspective. It is within this framework that we present a comparative analysis of Brazil and India’s past and recent experiences with FDI.

Acemoglou et al (2001, 2002, 2005) investigate the impact of colonialism on institutional and economic development of nations. They argue that the biggest impact of colonialism was on economic institutions. In settler colonies, the colonizing nations were more likely to establish institutions that protected property rights for broad masses. This resulted in an egalitarian distribution of political power. By doing so, basic ingredients for development were put in place. In other colonies, where European settlements where restricted, the colonizing power established “extractive” institutions that were inimical to progress. Moreover, to maintain these extractive formations, political power was concentrated in the hands of a small class of elites. These political and economic structures once established persisted even after the colonies became independent, resulting in divergent patterns of growth.

In this paper we concentrate on FDI and argue that the contrasting FDI policies in Brazil and India can be traced back to differences in论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。

共 1/11 页首页上一页1234567下一页尾页

英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非